The Associated Press reported that President Trump’s company said Wednesday (July 10) it has canceled a golf tournament with strippers serving as caddies that was to be held at Trump’s golf resort near Miami.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reports the Trump organization issued a statement saying the event would no longer take place because a children’s charity that was to benefit from it had pulled out.

Then the Trump company denied the stripper-caddy event was to benefit children.

Lies surround this presidency like groupies follow rock stars.

Does anyone see anything wrong with sponsoring a children’s fundraiser with strip girls from a strip club all over the green?

ABC also reports, “The tournament offered golfers a choice of dancers to be their caddy girl.”

Is there any morality left with the Trump name when dealing with children? Thousands of children imprisoned at the border have committed no crimes. It is legal to seek asylum at the U.S. border. But it’s not OK to seize children at the border and impound the very young and the youth in chain-link cages, denying them human sanitation, health items and bedding.

The whole world is watching the conditions that falls short of common decency and violate international standards. What country impounds children and abuses them on a massive scale? What kind of people have we become to allow our leaders to do this?

 

(10) comments

TwoToeJoe

Come on Branson! Last week you were concerned about the "TWENTY EIGHT CALENDAR GIRLS". This week you are worried about exotic dancers wanting to contribute to the local community and host a charity event. Does this mean you will not support our President in our fight against illegal aliens? Those working girls are doing their part in Making America Great Again!

Jc

Of course he would wanted strippers in association with small children . HE thinks Jeffrey Epstein is a great guy! He and his buddies entire lives revolve around his little *hands*

Branson Hunter

Jump in with something intelligently... Personal attacks are boring and not usually conforming the the HDS's terms of use. Anyone cares to defend Trump's racist statement and actions (that shocked the world)? Should Melania Trump go back to her country? Seems trump's loyalists are getting turned-on with "The "Leaders" racist talk. I've read all about history repeating itself.

yuccavalley711

XLNT article - THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT!

Branson Hunter

2Toes. I support Congress sitting down and hammering out a compromise that's acceptable to both sides. That the way it has to be done, the democratic way. Kindly put away the knives and focus on a better discussion. Don't simply follow the leader with insults. That is getting zero done to better the country or infrastructure. What is the plan with this administration?

TwoToeJoe

Obviously the plan of the current administration is to enforce our immigration laws as written by Congress Branson. Could that be considered a knife or insult to you? I guess you could respond and keep repeating our country is led by a Nazi and out snatching up innocent children and placing them in cages. Sorry my insults and knives can not match the tenacity you utilize! I will strive to do better!

Branson Hunter

TT please try and contain the sarcasm or insults. You write: "Obviously the plan of the current administration is to enforce our immigration laws as written by Congress." Not so: the administration is daily violating the constitutional protections of persons as protected by the still relevant U.S. Constitution. We are violating the human rights of people. THIS DOES NOT SOUND LIKE A PRESIDENT that enforces procedural or protected substantive due process and other fundamental protections this country was founded upon. I don't know about you but this doesn't sound like a president that likes democracy. I think this may be a factual statement. How do u think history will judge this president?

TwoToeJoe

Illegal immigration is not a human right. U.S. Code § 1325 which states that in the United States illegal immigration is the law regarding foreign nationals violating American immigration POLICIES and LAWS by entering or remaining in the country without receiving proper authorization from the Federal Government. Our president is enforcing these LAWS and abiding by these POLICIES. I don't know about you but it sounds like our President is doing his job. In my humble opinion any one who has the thought or idea that interprets the enforcement of our immigration laws as being led by a Nazi out snatching up innocent children and placing them in cages and or concentration camps could be considered as delusional. Donald J. Trump loves our Constitutional Republic. History will reflect that our President did all he could do to stop the massive inflow of illegal aliens taking advantage of our great country. Absolutely no sarcasm nor insults intended. Thank you very much for asking for my opinion! If you need me to repeat it again just ask.

Branson Hunter

You don't have to repeat it TT. You did a good expressing your opinion. We all understand that immigration

Branson Hunter

... ... I concur, US immigration for all who seeks it isn't considered to be a human right. HOWEVER, U.S. Codes are complex and comprehensive. I have familiar with immigration laws, having been an a former advocate and having assisting legal teams that were visibly litigating immigration matters. Immigration laws are about as complicated as labor law are. We are a country of laws are we not? Let me quote what supersedes your comment that it's not a human right to immigrate: *"Immigration Amnesty simply means the process of granting legal immigration status to persons who are in the United States illegally. Persons who entered the US illegally or persons whose immigration status has expired may qualify for immigration amnesty. Immigration amnesty is mostly granted to specific groups of people and granted only to those persons who have committed no other illegal activity apart from being in the country illegally. From 1986, Congress has occasionally passed legislation granting immigration amnesty to specific groups of persons. Immigration amnesty is a much debated issue. Some are of the belief that blanket amnesty should be granted to all persons who are in the US illegally but who have committed no other crimes. They also believe that if all the persons who are in the US illegally were removed, the US would suffer severe economic setbacks. Immigration amnesty simply means the process of granting legal immigration status to persons who are in the United States illegally. Persons who entered the US illegally or persons whose immigration status has expired may qualify for immigration amnesty. Immigration amnesty is mostly granted to specific groups of people and granted only to those persons who have committed no other illegal activity apart from being in the country illegally. From 1986, Congress has occasionally passed legislation granting immigration amnesty to specific groups of persons. Immigration amnesty is a much debated issue. Some are of the belief that blanket amnesty should be granted to all persons who are in the US illegally but who have committed no other crimes. They also believe that if all the persons who are in the US illegally were removed, the US would suffer severe economic setbacks.*" [end of quote|

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.